Case chronology
Structured timelines built from documents and testimony.
Structured litigation support — case chronology, deposition summaries, exhibit preparation, document organisation and trial prep — with attorney QA on every output.
Litigation support is the operational work that makes trial prep possible — chronology, deposition summaries, exhibit preparation, document organisation. Attorneys often handle this work between other deadlines, which means it's slow, inconsistent, and often done under pressure.
Opervics runs litigation support with trained legal specialists, documented workflows, and attorney QA on every output — so trial prep is thorough, on time, and defensible.
Structured timelines built from documents and testimony.
Deposition summaries prepared to attorney standards.
Exhibits prepared, organised and indexed for trial.
Documents organised and indexed for fast retrieval.
Trial prep support including witness files and outline assistance.
Progress, QA sampling and output status.
These are the same operational issues we see across clients — and the same ones our process is designed to remove.
Court deadlines require capacity that doesn't exist in-house.
Deposition summaries vary widely by reviewer.
Exhibits scattered, unindexed, hard to reference in court.
Timelines reconstructed under pressure at trial.
Files hard to search when time matters.
Nobody knows progress against deadlines.
Every service inherits the same baseline security posture, then adds service-specific controls on top.
Confidentiality controls, restricted access and privilege-safe workflows.
NDA-bound, trained legal staff, role-based access, auditable logs.
Attorneys verify every summary, chronology and exhibit before delivery.
Progress against deadlines and QA sampling reported weekly.
Yes — additional trained specialists can be assigned within days, and work is scheduled against your deadlines.
Commercial litigation, IP, employment, securities and regulatory matters — with matter-specific workflows defined in the scope.
Documented summary standards, AI-assisted pre-drafting and attorney QA on every output.
Relativity, Everlaw, Logikcull, iManage, NetDocuments and other litigation platforms — with role-based access set by you.
Progress against deadlines, QA sampling and output status — reported weekly.
Per matter, per FTE, or as a monthly retainer — agreed upfront.
A short conversation is usually enough to scope the matter and propose a starting point.