Data collection coordination
Collection coordinated with documented chain of custody.
eDiscovery support — data collection coordination, processing oversight, first-pass review, privilege log preparation and production QC — with AI-assisted review acceleration.
eDiscovery runs on documentation discipline. Every stage — collection, processing, review, privilege log, production — has to be handled carefully and defensibly, with a chain of custody that stands up if challenged.
Opervics runs eDiscovery support as a managed function — AI-assisted review acceleration with documented human verification, and full chain of custody throughout.
Collection coordinated with documented chain of custody.
First-pass review against matter-specific criteria.
Privilege logs prepared with documented rationale.
Productions checked for completeness and consistency.
Review acceleration with human verification throughout.
Review progress, QA sampling and production status.
These are the same operational issues we see across clients — and the same ones our process is designed to remove.
Data volumes exceed internal review capacity.
Court-ordered deadlines require capacity that doesn't exist.
Privilege candidates missed — waiver risk.
Productions delivered with errors — costly redo.
Handling not documented — defensibility risk.
Nobody knows progress against deadlines or QA rates.
Every service inherits the same baseline security posture, then adds service-specific controls on top.
Documented handling from collection through production.
NDA-bound, trained legal staff, role-based access, auditable logs.
Attorneys verify privilege determinations and production QC.
Review progress, QA sampling and production status reported weekly.
Relativity, Everlaw, Logikcull, Concordance, Nuix and other platforms — with role-based access set by you.
No. AI-assisted review flags privilege candidates; attorneys make every privilege determination.
Every handling step is documented and logged — from collection through production — so defensibility stands up to scrutiny.
Yes — additional trained reviewers can be assigned within days, and work is scheduled against court deadlines.
Review progress, QA sampling, production status — reported weekly.
Per gigabyte, per document, per FTE, or as a monthly retainer — agreed upfront.
A short conversation is usually enough to scope the matter and propose a starting point.