Aging bucket follow-up
Every bucket worked on schedule, not just the oldest.
Systematic aging-bucket follow-up that stops revenue from quietly aging out — payer-specific outreach, escalations, and 60/90/120+ reporting.
AR follow-up is where most practices lose money without noticing. Claims get submitted, then sit. Nobody works the 30-day bucket because it's not urgent; nobody works the 60-day bucket because other work got in the way. By the time the 90-day bucket gets attention, half of it is uncollectible.
Opervics runs AR follow-up as a systematic function — every bucket worked on schedule, payer-specific outreach, structured escalation, and 60/90/120+ reporting leadership can track.
Every bucket worked on schedule, not just the oldest.
Outreach tuned to each payer's behaviour and timelines.
Structured escalation for stalled or underpaid claims.
Aged AR buckets tracked and reported weekly.
Follow-up findings fed back to billing, coding and eligibility.
Aging reduction, recovery rate and payer trends.
These are the same operational issues we see across clients — and the same ones our process is designed to remove.
60/90/120+ buckets grow quietly while younger buckets absorb attention.
Revenue ages past the point of recovery before anyone works it.
Follow-up depends on who has time, not on a schedule.
Payer-specific patterns not tracked — same outreach for every payer.
Follow-up findings don't feed back into billing and coding.
Leadership can't see aging reduction or recovery trends.
Every service inherits the same baseline security posture, then adds service-specific controls on top.
Signed BAAs, PHI handling protocols, restricted access, and audit trails.
NDA-bound, HIPAA-trained staff, role-based access, and auditable logs.
AI output is reviewed by trained specialists before it reaches your systems.
Aging reduction, recovery rate and payer trends reported weekly.
Per payer timelines, documented in the scope. Most payers get 30/60/90-day cycles with additional follow-up on stalled claims.
Aged AR by bucket, recovery rate, top aging payers, and root-cause trends — reported weekly.
Structured escalation paths — payer-specific, with documented steps before write-off review.
Yes. We operate inside your existing billing, EHR and clearinghouse platforms with role-based access set by you.
Aging reduction, recovery rate, and payer-specific follow-up coverage — reported weekly.
Per FTE, per claim worked, or as a percentage of recovered revenue — agreed upfront.
A short conversation is usually enough to scope the process and propose a starting point.